<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://insummation.com/wp-content/plugins/seriously-simple-podcasting/templates/feed-stylesheet.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"
	 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	 xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"
	 xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
	>
		<channel>
		<title>In Summation</title>
		<atom:link href="https://insummation.com/feed/podcast/in-summation/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		<link>https://insummation.com/series/in-summation/</link>
		<description></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 11:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<copyright>&#xA9; 2026 In Summation</copyright>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:author>In Summation</itunes:author>
		<itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>In Summation</itunes:name>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
		<googleplay:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></googleplay:author>
						<googleplay:description></googleplay:description>
			<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
			<podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
		<podcast:guid>9c1669ed-e152-5cbf-a113-26505f04c2a2</podcast:guid>
		
		<!-- podcast_generator="SSP by Castos/3.15.0" Seriously Simple Podcasting plugin for WordPress (https://wordpress.org/plugins/seriously-simple-podcasting/) -->
		<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

<item>
	<title>New York v. McCray, Richardson, Salaam, Santana, and Wise (The Central Park Five)</title>
	<link>https://insummation.com/podcast/new-york-v-mccray-richardson-salaam-santana-and-wise-the-central-park-five/</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Summation]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insummation.com/podcast/new-york-v-mccray-richardson-salaam-santana-and-wise-the-central-park-five/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In any criminal justice system, there is bound to be abuse.  No system is perfect, not even close.  But the case discussed in this episode is one of the most egregious top-to-bottom failures of law enforcement in New York history.  Rights were violated, and at every turn where someone could have taken responsibility and ended...]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In any criminal justice system, there is bound to be abuse.  No system is perfect, not even close.  But the case discussed in this episode is one of the most egregious top-to-bottom failures of law enforcement in New York history.  Rights were violated, ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In any criminal justice system, there is bound to be abuse.  No system is perfect, not even close.  But the case discussed in this episode is one of the most egregious top-to-bottom failures of law enforcement in New York history.  Rights were violated, and at every turn where someone could have taken responsibility and ended...]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/1503910/episodes/19070261-new-york-v-mccray-richardson-salaam-santana-and-wise-the-central-park-five.mp3" length="48632954" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In any criminal justice system, there is bound to be abuse.  No system is perfect, not even close.  But the case discussed in this episode is one of the most egregious top-to-bottom failures of law enforcement in New York history.  Rights were violated, and at every turn where someone could have taken responsibility and ended...]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>01:07:29</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In any criminal justice system, there is bound to be abuse.  No system is perfect, not even close.  But the case discussed in this episode is one of the most egregious top-to-bottom failures of law enforcement in New York history.  Rights were violated, and at every turn where someone could have taken responsibility and ended...]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Idaho v. Daybell AND Arizona v. Daybell</title>
	<link>https://insummation.com/podcast/idaho-v-daybell-and-arizona-v-daybell/</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Summation]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insummation.com/podcast/idaho-v-daybell-and-arizona-v-daybell/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Hello Listeners and Friends, In this installment of In Summation, we discuss the Doomsday Mom, Lori Vallow Daybell, a woman who serves as proof that religious extremism is exceptionally dangerous.  These cases have it all, extramarital affairs, assassination attempts, mental disease, fanaticism, money, you name it.  And you get TWO cases this time, isn&apos;t that...]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Hello Listeners and Friends, In this installment of In Summation, we discuss the Doomsday Mom, Lori Vallow Daybell, a woman who serves as proof that religious extremism is exceptionally dangerous.  These cases have it all, extramarital affairs, assassina]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello Listeners and Friends, In this installment of In Summation, we discuss the Doomsday Mom, Lori Vallow Daybell, a woman who serves as proof that religious extremism is exceptionally dangerous.  These cases have it all, extramarital affairs, assassination attempts, mental disease, fanaticism, money, you name it.  And you get TWO cases this time, isn&apos;t that...]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/1503910/episodes/18995050-idaho-v-daybell-and-arizona-v-daybell.mp3" length="41471180" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Hello Listeners and Friends, In this installment of In Summation, we discuss the Doomsday Mom, Lori Vallow Daybell, a woman who serves as proof that religious extremism is exceptionally dangerous.  These cases have it all, extramarital affairs, assassination attempts, mental disease, fanaticism, money, you name it.  And you get TWO cases this time, isn&apos;t that...]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:57:32</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Hello Listeners and Friends, In this installment of In Summation, we discuss the Doomsday Mom, Lori Vallow Daybell, a woman who serves as proof that religious extremism is exceptionally dangerous.  These cases have it all, extramarital affairs, assassination attempts, mental disease, fanaticism, money, you name it.  And you get TWO cases this time, isn&apos;t that...]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>United States v. Sean Combs (Puff Daddy/P. Diddy/Diddy/Brother Love)</title>
	<link>https://insummation.com/podcast/united-states-v-sean-combs-puff-daddy-p-diddy-diddy-brother-love/</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Summation]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insummation.com/podcast/united-states-v-sean-combs-puff-daddy-p-diddy-diddy-brother-love/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Welcome back!  The wait for a new episode is over. In a triumphant return, Paul breaks down the federal case against Sean &#8220;Diddy&#8221; Combs.  Combs was charged with RICO, sex trafficking, and interstate transportation for the purposes of prostitution. In this episode, we discuss what overcharging looks like, how fame affects criminal cases, and how...]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Welcome back!  The wait for a new episode is over. In a triumphant return, Paul breaks down the federal case against Sean &#8220;Diddy&#8221; Combs.  Combs was charged with RICO, sex trafficking, and interstate transportation for the purposes of prostitu]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Welcome back!  The wait for a new episode is over. In a triumphant return, Paul breaks down the federal case against Sean &#8220;Diddy&#8221; Combs.  Combs was charged with RICO, sex trafficking, and interstate transportation for the purposes of prostitution. In this episode, we discuss what overcharging looks like, how fame affects criminal cases, and how...]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/1503910/episodes/18213990-united-states-v-sean-combs-puff-daddy-p-diddy-diddy-brother-love.mp3" length="40904949" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Welcome back!  The wait for a new episode is over. In a triumphant return, Paul breaks down the federal case against Sean &#8220;Diddy&#8221; Combs.  Combs was charged with RICO, sex trafficking, and interstate transportation for the purposes of prostitution. In this episode, we discuss what overcharging looks like, how fame affects criminal cases, and how...]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:56:45</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Welcome back!  The wait for a new episode is over. In a triumphant return, Paul breaks down the federal case against Sean &#8220;Diddy&#8221; Combs.  Combs was charged with RICO, sex trafficking, and interstate transportation for the purposes of prostitution. In this episode, we discuss what overcharging looks like, how fame affects criminal cases, and how...]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>California v. Orenthal James Simpson</title>
	<link>https://insummation.com/podcast/california-v-orenthal-james-simpson/</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Summation]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insummation.com/podcast/california-v-orenthal-james-simpson/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[OJ Simpson&apos;s arrest and trial captivated the country.  Dubbed the &#8220;trial of the century,&#8221; the 1995 spectacle grabbed eyeballs with gavel to gavel coverage for approximately 10 months.  The trial was packed with celebrity, DNA evidence, grusome crime scene photos, a massive fall from grace, racial tensions, devastating cross-examinations, jury field trips, and more. Since...]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[OJ Simpson&apos;s arrest and trial captivated the country.  Dubbed the &#8220;trial of the century,&#8221; the 1995 spectacle grabbed eyeballs with gavel to gavel coverage for approximately 10 months.  The trial was packed with celebrity, DNA evidence, g]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[OJ Simpson&apos;s arrest and trial captivated the country.  Dubbed the &#8220;trial of the century,&#8221; the 1995 spectacle grabbed eyeballs with gavel to gavel coverage for approximately 10 months.  The trial was packed with celebrity, DNA evidence, grusome crime scene photos, a massive fall from grace, racial tensions, devastating cross-examinations, jury field trips, and more. Since...]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/1503910/episodes/16940604-california-v-orenthal-james-simpson.mp3" length="69698846" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[OJ Simpson&apos;s arrest and trial captivated the country.  Dubbed the &#8220;trial of the century,&#8221; the 1995 spectacle grabbed eyeballs with gavel to gavel coverage for approximately 10 months.  The trial was packed with celebrity, DNA evidence, grusome crime scene photos, a massive fall from grace, racial tensions, devastating cross-examinations, jury field trips, and more. Since...]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>01:36:44</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[OJ Simpson&apos;s arrest and trial captivated the country.  Dubbed the &#8220;trial of the century,&#8221; the 1995 spectacle grabbed eyeballs with gavel to gavel coverage for approximately 10 months.  The trial was packed with celebrity, DNA evidence, grusome crime scene photos, a massive fall from grace, racial tensions, devastating cross-examinations, jury field trips, and more. Since...]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>In Summation Explains: Collateral Estoppel</title>
	<link>https://insummation.com/podcast/in-summation-explains-collateral-estoppel/</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Summation]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insummation.com/podcast/in-summation-explains-collateral-estoppel/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Lawyers, like other professionals, tend to use a lot of industry terms which don&apos;t make sense to the average person.  Sometimes, those terms pop up in artcles and media describing a case, without explanation (often because the journalists themselves do not fully understand what they mean). Today, we discuss the term collateral estoppel, and what...]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Lawyers, like other professionals, tend to use a lot of industry terms which don&apos;t make sense to the average person.  Sometimes, those terms pop up in artcles and media describing a case, without explanation (often because the journalists themselves]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lawyers, like other professionals, tend to use a lot of industry terms which don&apos;t make sense to the average person.  Sometimes, those terms pop up in artcles and media describing a case, without explanation (often because the journalists themselves do not fully understand what they mean). Today, we discuss the term collateral estoppel, and what...]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/1503910/episodes/16850522-in-summation-explains-collateral-estoppel.mp3" length="4655677" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lawyers, like other professionals, tend to use a lot of industry terms which don&apos;t make sense to the average person.  Sometimes, those terms pop up in artcles and media describing a case, without explanation (often because the journalists themselves do not fully understand what they mean). Today, we discuss the term collateral estoppel, and what...]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:06:24</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Lawyers, like other professionals, tend to use a lot of industry terms which don&apos;t make sense to the average person.  Sometimes, those terms pop up in artcles and media describing a case, without explanation (often because the journalists themselves do not fully understand what they mean). Today, we discuss the term collateral estoppel, and what...]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>In Summation Explains: Decriminalization vs. Legalization</title>
	<link>https://insummation.com/podcast/in-summation-explains-decriminalization-vs-legalization/</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Summation]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insummation.com/podcast/in-summation-explains-decriminalization-vs-legalization/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Welcome back.  In this brief episode, Paul digs into the difference between the terms decriminalization and legalization.  They are frequently used interchangeably by people who do not fully appreciate the difference. At the end of this In Summation Explains episode, you will come away with a deeper understanding of just what it means when the...]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Welcome back.  In this brief episode, Paul digs into the difference between the terms decriminalization and legalization.  They are frequently used interchangeably by people who do not fully appreciate the difference. At the end of this In Summation Expl]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Welcome back.  In this brief episode, Paul digs into the difference between the terms decriminalization and legalization.  They are frequently used interchangeably by people who do not fully appreciate the difference. At the end of this In Summation Explains episode, you will come away with a deeper understanding of just what it means when the...]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/1503910/episodes/16850501-in-summation-explains-decriminalization-vs-legalization.mp3" length="3932160" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Welcome back.  In this brief episode, Paul digs into the difference between the terms decriminalization and legalization.  They are frequently used interchangeably by people who do not fully appreciate the difference. At the end of this In Summation Explains episode, you will come away with a deeper understanding of just what it means when the...]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:05:24</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Welcome back.  In this brief episode, Paul digs into the difference between the terms decriminalization and legalization.  They are frequently used interchangeably by people who do not fully appreciate the difference. At the end of this In Summation Explains episode, you will come away with a deeper understanding of just what it means when the...]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>In Summation Explains: No Harm No Foul, Right?</title>
	<link>https://insummation.com/podcast/in-summation-explains-no-harm-no-foul-right/</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Summation]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insummation.com/podcast/in-summation-explains-no-harm-no-foul-right/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In the second installment of In Summation Explains, Paul explains what happens when someone undoes the wrong they caused before they get caught, and whether that is a defense to any potential liability after the fact. If you like this new format, write in and make your voice heard.  Paul hopes you enjoy it and...]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In the second installment of In Summation Explains, Paul explains what happens when someone undoes the wrong they caused before they get caught, and whether that is a defense to any potential liability after the fact. If you like this new format, write i]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In the second installment of In Summation Explains, Paul explains what happens when someone undoes the wrong they caused before they get caught, and whether that is a defense to any potential liability after the fact. If you like this new format, write in and make your voice heard.  Paul hopes you enjoy it and...]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/1503910/episodes/16483010-in-summation-explains-no-harm-no-foul-right.mp3" length="6207569" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the second installment of In Summation Explains, Paul explains what happens when someone undoes the wrong they caused before they get caught, and whether that is a defense to any potential liability after the fact. If you like this new format, write in and make your voice heard.  Paul hopes you enjoy it and...]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:08:34</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In the second installment of In Summation Explains, Paul explains what happens when someone undoes the wrong they caused before they get caught, and whether that is a defense to any potential liability after the fact. If you like this new format, write in and make your voice heard.  Paul hopes you enjoy it and...]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>In Summation Explains: Habeus Corpus</title>
	<link>https://insummation.com/podcast/in-summation-explains-habeus-corpus/</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Summation]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insummation.com/podcast/in-summation-explains-habeus-corpus/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[What does habeus corpus mean? how does it work? what does it actually do?  In this new segment of In Summation, Paul explains specific legal terms and areas of law which confuse people.  This is going be based mostly on listener feedback, so if you are curious about a legal latin phrase, or legal theory,...]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[What does habeus corpus mean? how does it work? what does it actually do?  In this new segment of In Summation, Paul explains specific legal terms and areas of law which confuse people.  This is going be based mostly on listener feedback, so if you are c]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[What does habeus corpus mean? how does it work? what does it actually do?  In this new segment of In Summation, Paul explains specific legal terms and areas of law which confuse people.  This is going be based mostly on listener feedback, so if you are curious about a legal latin phrase, or legal theory,...]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/1503910/episodes/16483015-in-summation-explains-habeus-corpus.mp3" length="8577351" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[What does habeus corpus mean? how does it work? what does it actually do?  In this new segment of In Summation, Paul explains specific legal terms and areas of law which confuse people.  This is going be based mostly on listener feedback, so if you are curious about a legal latin phrase, or legal theory,...]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:11:51</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[What does habeus corpus mean? how does it work? what does it actually do?  In this new segment of In Summation, Paul explains specific legal terms and areas of law which confuse people.  This is going be based mostly on listener feedback, so if you are curious about a legal latin phrase, or legal theory,...]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>New York v. Daniel Penny</title>
	<link>https://insummation.com/podcast/new-york-v-daniel-penny/</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Summation]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insummation.com/podcast/new-york-v-daniel-penny/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, recurring guest Adam Uris and I discuss the recent New York prosecution of Daniel Penny, the 24 year old marine corps veteran who killed Jordan Neely on the subway after Neely was aggressive and threatening to other passengers.  Was this done in defense of subway riders?  Did Penny go too far?  Was...]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, recurring guest Adam Uris and I discuss the recent New York prosecution of Daniel Penny, the 24 year old marine corps veteran who killed Jordan Neely on the subway after Neely was aggressive and threatening to other passengers.  Was this]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, recurring guest Adam Uris and I discuss the recent New York prosecution of Daniel Penny, the 24 year old marine corps veteran who killed Jordan Neely on the subway after Neely was aggressive and threatening to other passengers.  Was this done in defense of subway riders?  Did Penny go too far?  Was...]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/1503910/episodes/16442137-new-york-v-daniel-penny.mp3" length="50583306" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, recurring guest Adam Uris and I discuss the recent New York prosecution of Daniel Penny, the 24 year old marine corps veteran who killed Jordan Neely on the subway after Neely was aggressive and threatening to other passengers.  Was this done in defense of subway riders?  Did Penny go too far?  Was...]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>01:10:12</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, recurring guest Adam Uris and I discuss the recent New York prosecution of Daniel Penny, the 24 year old marine corps veteran who killed Jordan Neely on the subway after Neely was aggressive and threatening to other passengers.  Was this done in defense of subway riders?  Did Penny go too far?  Was...]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Georgia v. Jeffery Williams (aka Young Thug) (part 2)</title>
	<link>https://insummation.com/podcast/georgia-v-jeffery-williams-aka-young-thug-part-2/</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Summation]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insummation.com/podcast/georgia-v-jeffery-williams-aka-young-thug-part-2/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Hello All, At the end of October there was a whirlwind of activity in the Young Thug trial down in Fulton County Georgia.  All of a sudden, in the span of one week, multiple defendants opted to take a plea after nearly two years at trial. Listen to the breakdown of how the circus put...]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Hello All, At the end of October there was a whirlwind of activity in the Young Thug trial down in Fulton County Georgia.  All of a sudden, in the span of one week, multiple defendants opted to take a plea after nearly two years at trial. Listen to the b]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello All, At the end of October there was a whirlwind of activity in the Young Thug trial down in Fulton County Georgia.  All of a sudden, in the span of one week, multiple defendants opted to take a plea after nearly two years at trial. Listen to the breakdown of how the circus put...]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://www.buzzsprout.com/1503910/episodes/16243229-georgia-v-jeffery-williams-aka-young-thug-part-2.mp3" length="27902607" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Hello All, At the end of October there was a whirlwind of activity in the Young Thug trial down in Fulton County Georgia.  All of a sudden, in the span of one week, multiple defendants opted to take a plea after nearly two years at trial. Listen to the breakdown of how the circus put...]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:38:41</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[In Summation]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Hello All, At the end of October there was a whirlwind of activity in the Young Thug trial down in Fulton County Georgia.  All of a sudden, in the span of one week, multiple defendants opted to take a plea after nearly two years at trial. Listen to the breakdown of how the circus put...]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
